law.com.intro.htm
Online law blogs recreational, for duplicate bridge pundits, might be a bit
of bathos for many, but I might as well make comment.
Prior blogs there were newsgroups like rec.games.bridge with their stiff formats
for old newsreaders that just won't update.
Some shirk convention and try own methods of restrictive formats avoidance.
How far?
Some want their own format and it can't even fit properly on blogspot.com,
an Appeals Committee case such as: http://eastontario.com/handStories/243z1dp1hp1sp1np2dp2sp4sppp3033202310121102121221030023131103333231201312020020.htm
Some invent javascript driven interactive webpages to try to better present,
and release them FREE, referring to some trendy university GNU substitute
or complement, such as at
eastontario.com/handStories/handTEMPLATE.htm
better called via Internet Explorer from
...handTEMPLATE.htm#243z1dp1hp1sp1np2dp2sp4sppp3033202310121102121221030023131103333231201312020020
a joining/concatenation of
eastontario.com/handStories/handTEMPLATE.htm
and
#
and
243z1dp1hp1sp1np2dp2sp4sppp3033202310121102121221030023131103333231201312020020
|
NORTH
K95
K532
8
Q7542 |
|
642
AJ96
QT9
AJ9
|
T83
QT87
A3
K863
|
| |
AQJ7
4
KJ76542
T
|
|
|
| Dealer: South Vul:
EW MP
Scoring |
|
|
|
Appeals Committee Presentation
|
Rotated to South declarer: originally board: 12
South with 11 HCPs (a "Rule of Twenty" 22 count equivalent) opened
a clear 1
.
North responded with a clear 1
.
South rebid a clear 1
.
North answered that with a clear 1N.
South at IMPs bid a non forcing 2
.
North chose spades well with 2
.
South referred to some idea of a Last Hurray peaking at tournament score table,
considered the somewhat much less probable idea of an IMP based, otherwise
even probable Masterpoint or Money Award probabity calculation and bid in
many opinions a now "outrageous", now "totally ridiculous",
now "somewhat interesting", now "dangerously other than clearcut"
4
.
In baseball, it's like bunting needed 12 runs with bases loaded and none out,
and then no such thing...a rationale and clearcut necessity for final award
pursuers ignoring the short term ideas of probability.
It's the big picture before realizing that too many would be proved wrong
and the cost of the inconvenience to those valued, perhaps to very needy and
dependent group of powerful majority somewhat ignorant and self-satisfied
complacent not ne'er do wells...perhaps not total scum of the earth, considers
of dumping a deal or tournament or title to something somehow a compelling
boss...or power that be.
A 7 card fit (Moysian) with 11 HCP opposite 8 HCP should be a blasphemy to
those teaching Beginners and Novices and probably intermediates...a contamination
for other than at least Advanced....maybe experts....but who knows that chairs
and rules and present at Appeals committees.
You know?
I dunno.
Down one possibly on a necessary early try at establishing a club discard on a
heart before established a diamond suit.
Misplayed or simply throwing a board?
Not clear? Depends on the committee? Who chairs?